Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Nitro N50-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Nitro N50-600(DCH)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '20 at 16:53
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 82.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 239 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 671 71% 566 Pts	64-Core 728 45% 728 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B 3454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 38.3 32% 36.7 fps	MRender 41.9 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 37.3 32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GB 13,793 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 207 305 156 177 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 686 Write 479 Mixed 623 SusWrite 249 114% 509 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 36.1 146% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 632 DQ Write 633 DQ Mixed 455 391% 573 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 136%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 792GB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 194 195 195 192 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 168 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 194 100% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 12GB 1,808 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 18 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 14.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,885x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	1,316x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	420x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	875x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	547x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	527x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	660x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	244x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	227x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	329x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	314x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 10,608 samples	198x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16