Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics 346 User benchmarks, average bench 67% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 70.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 187 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 381 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Legend(17AA 3130) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Lighting 14 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 17.8 11% 15.1 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 14.6 Splatting 18.5 12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 52 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 289 Write 57.8 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 51.7 26% 122 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 4.9 74% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 46.9 DQ Mixed 95.5 69% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 7.2 9.6 8.4 7.5 9.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	8.84% Terrible	Read 37.3 Write 13.3 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 8.5 18% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.84% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 13.6 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 99.3 40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16