Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 176 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 368 44% 339 Pts	64-Core 429 26% 429 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 3000M 2,560 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.95 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 128GB 781 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 77 67 74 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 369 Write 124 Mixed 285 SusWrite 90.8 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 15.3 60% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 193 168% 248 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples	237x
Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples	91x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	88x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	15x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 45%, 359 samples	15x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 45%, 20 samples	13x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16