Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 15:56
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 202
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 578
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.7% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 148
31% 85.2 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 38
Splatting 86
51% 59.5 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 116 386 388 392 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 288
Write 300
Mixed 301
SusWrite 309
68% 300 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 12.8
62% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 101
118% 212 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 243%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
166GB free
Firmware: AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 84 246 247 249 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.1% Above average
Read 212
Write 152
Mixed 84
SusWrite 202
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 16.6
58% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 55.3
94% 189 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
383GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 85 260 260 260 260 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.7% Above average
Read 172
Write 115
Mixed 199
SusWrite 210
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 23.4
82% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 289
214% 284 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
114GB free
Firmware: AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 44 219 247 254 256 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 201
Write 86.8
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 181
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 5
16% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5P Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $682
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback