Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 14:50
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 251
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 766
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 11
Parallax 8.25
6% 9.02 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 15.4
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 199
Parallax 193
148% 191 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 177
Splatting 124
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 470 448 480 482 431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 483
Mixed 414
SusWrite 459
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 52.3
183% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
737GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 76.8
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 96.5
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
519GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 154 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 117
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 153
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
253GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 105 103 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68% Good
Read 134
Write 89.3
Mixed 77
SusWrite 103
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
5GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 13 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 116
Write 40.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 15.4
62% 56 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.8
236% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.5
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback