Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 772
72% 600 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190
142GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 340 211 286 126 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 465
Write 445
Mixed 354
SusWrite 242
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 31.6
121% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 191
182% 286 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$92
596GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2200 2129 1490 1430 1416 1410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,085
Write 1,917
Mixed 1,489
SusWrite 1679
403% 1,792 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 77
241% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 557
DQ Mixed 813
589% 773 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 295%
Great: 410%
OCZ Agility 4 256GB-$90
34GB free
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 175 190 196 206 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.7% Good
Read 211
Write 128
Mixed 154
SusWrite 194
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 21.4
102% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 202
158% 218 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 43.2
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 23
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback