Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3460-$49
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 89.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 201
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
Asus(1043 86CE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 74.5
75% 84 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 75.9
61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 149 20 15 17 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 365
Write 432
Mixed 286
SusWrite 84.1
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 43.5
160% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 155
133% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 126%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
381GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 40 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 38.2
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 40.6
28% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
370GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 72 71 72 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 75.2
Write 72.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 71
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1373 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 2,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $758
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback