Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 11:36
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 527
59% 465 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.28
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18.7
12% 16 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 16.8
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 100 102 100 102 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 233
Write 148
Mixed 168
SusWrite 105
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 23.4
74% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 118
90% 121 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
12GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 283
Write 212
Mixed 206
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 20.6
67% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 144
115% 161 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Intel 330 Series 60GB
31GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 68 71 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 387
Write 70.8
Mixed 112
SusWrite 67.9
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 23.4
77% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 84.9
64% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 177 174 182 176 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 152
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 176
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
68GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 129
Write 85.3
Mixed 71
SusWrite 99.9
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 181 178 172 179 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 88.3
Write 123
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 176
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
217% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 50.8
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 45.7
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback