| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Z1 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3561h |
| Memory | 28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130403 |
| Uptime | 2.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '20 at 07:45 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
71.7%
Very good
|
71% 125 Pts
|
50% 376 Pts
|
23% 377 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 3561) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
4.19%
Terrible
|
4% 4.61 fps
|
5% 5.74 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5FAM018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 147 157 137 174 188 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
34% 154 MB/s
|
38% 15.2 MB/s
|
19% 45.9 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
520GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 175 179 179 180 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
103% 140 MB/s
|
168% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
ASMT 2115 1TB
822GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 28 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
36% 27 MB/s
|
73% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
55.2%
Above average
|
56% 19.5 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
48% 82.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z1 Workstation Builds (Compare 73 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z1 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples | 29x |
| Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples | 15x |
| Xeon E31280IntelBench 73%, 472 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples | 28x |
| HD Graphics P3000IntelBench 2%, 729 samples | 9x |
| Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 13% - Very poor | Total price: $100 |