PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151225 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 23 '20 at 20:30 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 76 75 71 68 71 MB/s
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
155GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 94 95 95 95 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 10 10 10 10 9.8 MB/s
|
5.63%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 42x |
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 34x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 26x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 21x |
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $163 |