HP 255 G1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 255 G1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 188B
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 19:09
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 42.8
15% 32.3 Pts
4-Core 42.4
8-Core 42.7
6% 42.6 Pts
64-Core 42.9
3% 42.9 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 188B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 4.3
1% 3.57 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 3
1% 2.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$100
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 256 289 313 293 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 376
Write 339
Mixed 340
SusWrite 286
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 10.9
38% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 86.8
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 68.9
53% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5469-078.A00LF Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.3
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 255 G1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $144
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback