Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 16:56
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 67.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 192 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 421 56% 420 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 18.2 11% 14.4 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 14.4 Splatting 18.2 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 128 135 101 127 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 436 Write 296 Mixed 304 SusWrite 147 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 14.5 65% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 69 DQ Mixed 35.1 41% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 60GB free Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 28 40 40 35 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 35.7 Write 8.3 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 36.5 18% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 41%
hp v220w 16GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 23GB free, PID 5a07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.2 6.9 6.7 8.8 6.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.69% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 10 Mixed 6.5 SusWrite 6.8 14% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 36% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.69% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	814x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	742x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	446x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	412x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	193x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16