Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite A205 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ISKAA
Memory	1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080611
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 15:24
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T2390 1,249 User benchmarks, average bench 29% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 18.7 2-Core 36.2 30% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 41.7 8-Core 39 6% 40.3 Pts	64-Core 40.3 2% 40.3 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 FF00) 384MB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.13% Terrible	Lighting 0.23 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.13% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 32 18 41 45 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 56.6 Write 45.2 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 34.8 31% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.89% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 1.93 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.89% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16