Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% J1PR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 15.8 2-Core 21.9 28% 35 Pts	4-Core 27.7 8-Core 36 4% 31.9 Pts	64-Core 25.3 2% 25.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 445GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 4.2 5.4 5.2 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Read 16.6 Write 12.2 Mixed 11.9 SusWrite 7.9 9% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 88%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 11GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.6 8.9 9.6 9.1 9 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	8.15% Terrible	Read 26.9 Write 13.7 Mixed 14 SusWrite 9.3 19% 16 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.2 67% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.15% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	4.84% Terrible	MC Read 0.6 MC Write 1.2 MC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.83 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 0.5 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,039x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16