Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 09:18
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 74 1-Core 148 2-Core 300 92% 174 Pts	4-Core 603 8-Core 989 97% 796 Pts	64-Core 1,460 90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Lighting 96 Reflection 84.6 Parallax 139 78% 107 fps	MRender 84.1 Gravity 102 Splatting 121 86% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 135 143 136 118 131 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.1% Below average	Read 197 Write 112 Mixed 181 SusWrite 134 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 10.6 35% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 83 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 141 99% 123 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 84%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 222GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 142 133 137 140 141 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.3% Above average	Read 230 Write 195 Mixed 193 SusWrite 142 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 13.4 85% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 150 120% 167 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.2 5.2 4.9 5.3 5 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 5 12% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.4 157% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x8GB 1,118 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.6% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 30.3 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 28.6 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	762x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	620x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	593x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	499x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	378x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	367x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	427x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	267x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	226x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $924

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16