Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,371 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 52.6 2-Core 106 53% 81.8 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 497 45% 377 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Lighting 7.63 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 6.31 6% 7.58 fps	MRender 9.86 Gravity 7.87 Splatting 8.48 7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 169 174 178 174 171 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 232 Write 228 Mixed 210 SusWrite 175 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 23.1 76% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 181 136% 180 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 316GB free Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 84.5 Write 78.3 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 83.8 54% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C 4x8GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 33.3 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16