Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 08:39
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 71
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,156
104% 875 Pts
64-Core 2,178
135% 2,178 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 168
Parallax 178
139% 172 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 141
Splatting 105
113% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 238 241 263 218 233 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 462
Write 231
Mixed 210
SusWrite 238
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 26.7
98% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 118
91% 128 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 86%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
125GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,468
Write 2,315
Mixed 1,622
475% 2,135 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 88.7
295% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1360
DQ Write 1,207
DQ Mixed 1,273
958% 1,280 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
190GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 50 49 46 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 35
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 48.4
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
468GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 60 61 61 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 57
Write 57
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 60
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 26.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback