Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 07:11
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 229
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 429
51% 395 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 152
Parallax 139
109% 141 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 136
Splatting 112
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 374 435 441 442 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 368
Mixed 392
SusWrite 403
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 36.2
139% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 294
238% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 100%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
238GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 167 182 186 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 63.5
Write 172
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 174
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.3
122% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
672GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 150 148 148 152 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 61.7
Write 136
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 147
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $639
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback