Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	44.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 06:59
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	CRI-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 83.9 1-Core 128 2-Core 250 85% 154 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 961 86% 727 Pts	64-Core 1,316 82% 1,316 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2983) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Lighting 80.8 Reflection 87.9 Parallax 83.5 66% 84.1 fps	MRender 82.3 Gravity 74.4 Splatting 69.4 61% 75.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109 10,807 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2320000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 177 177 177 178 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 495 Write 161 Mixed 174 SusWrite 176 55% 251 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 14.1 100% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 77.2 86% 145 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 101 100 102 105 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 77.5 Write 91 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 99 55% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 0.4 196% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 75%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID cb10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 17.8 Mixed 4.2 9% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVGB CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB 48GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 32.1 99% 34.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 28.1 85% 29.7 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16