Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 05:37
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 973
88% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,322
82% 1,322 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,212
Write 1,481
Mixed 628
316% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 68.8
259% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 723
578% 812 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
71GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 82.6
65% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
21GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 69 70 70 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 52.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 64.7
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 67%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
126GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 96 97 112 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62% Good
Read 112
Write 120
Mixed 101
SusWrite 103
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
112GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 84 94 90 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 101
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 92.8
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 88%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
76GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 107 111 114 125 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 118
Write 122
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 120
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
80GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 82 93 76 75 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 57
Write 66
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 84.1
52% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 40
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 23.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback