Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-DS3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 05:28
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 112 2-Core 222 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 430 58% 435 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.1% Very good	Lighting 96.2 Reflection 105 Parallax 95.2 78% 98.7 fps	MRender 88.1 Gravity 89.5 Splatting 85.3 72% 87.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 300 12 95 46 6.9 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 252 Write 102 Mixed 85 SusWrite 121 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 8.8 40% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 15 11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 94%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 334GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 147 148 149 149 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 138 Write 128 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 147 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB 15,450 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.9% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 13.6 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.5 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	79x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	65x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	59x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16