PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 16.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160617 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 23 '20 at 02:53 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36B9) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 350 375 381 378 382 MB/s
|
96%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
189GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 64 65 65 65 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown OCZ3X16002G OCZ3X16002G 1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series 20GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |