| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121219 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 23 '20 at 02:09 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.4%
Good
|
66% 108 Pts
|
27% 200 Pts
|
12% 194 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
|
20.3%
Poor
|
21% 21.1 fps
|
20% 24.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 174 42 78 50 78 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
31% 139 MB/s
|
60% 16.7 MB/s
|
27% 44.7 MB/s
|
|
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
554GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 86 85 87 86 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
65% 88.6 MB/s
|
157% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
52.6%
Above average
|
51% 18 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-MX Builds (Compare 454 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 49x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 33x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 33x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 50x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 26x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |