Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 01:34
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 970
86% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,330
82% 1,330 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 57.5
53% 62.9 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 66.3
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2281 832 830 835 831 832 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,601
Write 2,411
Mixed 1,868
SusWrite 1,074
445% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 93
311% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 940
703% 936 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 308%
Great: 355%
SSD 256GB 256GB
66GB free
Firmware: S0328A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 6.4 6.7 26 7.1 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 415
Write 351
Mixed 305
SusWrite 41.5
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 64.9
DQ Write 6.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
9% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 166%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
447GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 142
Write 136
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 97.8
72% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
298GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 86 85 84 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 82.7
Write 65.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 83.4
47% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 47%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
21GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 34 40 41 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 137
Write 8.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 37.2
47% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
110% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 28
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback