Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory120.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime52.4 Days
Run DateJan 22 '20 at 22:01
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel 0000
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 158
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 610
54% 460 Pts
64-Core 2216
137% 2216 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 181
Parallax 216
107% 176 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 198
Splatting 131
149% 190 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 117%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 633 628 610 618 618 618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 648
Write 572
Mixed 585
SusWrite 621
137% 607 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 61
201% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 725
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 659
497% 667 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 156%
Great: 329%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1361 1309 1233 1135 1134 1146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 126%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
297GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 446 437 444 444 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 423
Mixed 312
SusWrite 444
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 36.9
133% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 158
130% 182 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 105%
LSI Logical Volume 19.5TB
756GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 237 239 241 247 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
Read 293
Write 296
Mixed 111
SusWrite 240
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 2.8
13% 5.03 MB/s
DQ Read 9.7
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 5.4
6% 10.1 MB/s
Seagate ST4000NM0034 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: E001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 207 207 208 209 208 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
121% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 215
Mixed 100
SusWrite 208
135% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.6
276% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1B1 9965589-007.E00G 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1B1 9965589-037.D00G Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 9965589-007.E00G Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 9965589-006.E00G 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1B1 Undef... 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 46.3
MC Mixed 42.7
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback