Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '20 at 20:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 683
70% 567 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6793
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 106
Parallax 8.19
5% 40.1 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 16.3
10% 12 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 330 348 426 419 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 753
Write 320
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 362
79% 363 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 56.7
150% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,088
DQ Write 67
DQ Mixed 154
218% 436 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 126%
Great: 228%
WD My Book 1112 2TB
948GB free, PID 1112
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 43 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 43
Write 41.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 42.5
54% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 23.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback