| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M Pro4 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190801 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '20 at 19:38 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.1%
Very good
|
69% 125 Pts
|
57% 422 Pts
|
26% 421 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.1%
Above average
|
53% 72.5 fps
|
53% 65.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 64 55 21 7.3 53 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
56% 250 MB/s
|
109% 41.1 MB/s
|
131% 202 MB/s
|
|
Microsoft Storage Space Device 118GB
33GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 82 153 77 79 78 MB/s
|
80.4%
Excellent
|
69% 311 MB/s
|
136% 47.7 MB/s
|
170% 249 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
332GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 155 163 162 163 163 MB/s
|
85.4%
Excellent
|
86% 119 MB/s
|
146% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-121.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
79.6%
Very good
|
83% 28.9 GB/s
|
69% 24.2 GB/s
|
40% 99.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 60 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4 R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $102Bench 68%, 93,718 samples | 11x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 10x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $500 |