Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '20 at 19:38
Run Duration	288 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$292 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 97.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 300 101% 184 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,145 104% 872 Pts	64-Core 1,648 102% 1,648 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 32.9 Reflection 38 Parallax 30.8 27% 33.9 fps	MRender 47 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 42.9 34% 40.9 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 610 611 609 611 610 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 2,562 Write 2,329 Mixed 1,438 SusWrite 658 389% 1,747 MB/s	4K Read 64.5 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 87.2 295% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,098 DQ Write 796 DQ Mixed 954 711% 950 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 340%
2.5" SATA SSD 3TG6-P 2TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: A19307 SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 437 441 434 435 440 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 427 Mixed 216 SusWrite 437 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 33.6 137% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 105 108% 180 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 89%
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB 11,716 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 25GB free Firmware: X4130012 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 496 Write 464 Mixed 239 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 51.9 189% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 222 186% 274 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 90%
SABRENT 1TB 525GB free Firmware: RKT303.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1690 873 916 876 882 871 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 11,954 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 25 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 33.5 SC Mixed 29.9 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 47.7 84% 47.7 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	168x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	157x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	185x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	127x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,049

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16