Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 156 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 294 40% 295 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 830C) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.6% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.87 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.6% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PLUS 480GB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z31000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 51 52 51 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.6% Below average	Read 156 Write 104 Mixed 104 SusWrite 50.4 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 24.2 82% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 50.1 DQ Mixed 31.3 26% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 76GB free Firmware: 3.AHH SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 52 52 52 52 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 58.2 Write 27.5 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 51.1 33% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $159

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16