Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 203 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 477 48% 390 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 870C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 128 Parallax 137 105% 132 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 119 Splatting 108 108% 137 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 102 103 109 97 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 135 Write 128 Mixed 142 SusWrite 105 29% 128 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 27.3 102% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 19.4 29% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 161GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,430 Write 4,942 Mixed 5,294 1,235% 5,555 MB/s	4K Read 697 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 93.1 1,270% 323 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 901 DQ Mixed 1,012 659% 748 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 903GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 26.3 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 28 37% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	228x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	89x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $566

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16