Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80EC (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '20 at 17:37
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka) 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 47 2-Core 69.6 37% 57.5 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 104 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 3,765 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 3830) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.351.1007.0 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 5.75 4% 5.12 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 4.63 Splatting 4.87 4% 4.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 76 100 104 105 108 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.9% Below average	Read 252 Write 244 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 98.4 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 15.1 52% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19 DQ Write 13 DQ Mixed 8.1 8% 13.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 85%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB 40,989 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 765GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 100 104 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 105 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 104 68% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GB 10,170 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EC

CPU
FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 33%, 4,105 samples	132x
A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 31%, 6,248 samples	90x
A8-7100 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 32%, 1,069 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,765 samples	130x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 5,093 samples	90x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 1,187 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GBRAMAXELBench 42%, 3,176 samples	60x
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 47%, 5,452 samples	22x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16