Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2276M 1,872 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 84.9 1-Core 136 2-Core 265 89% 162 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 553 65% 502 Pts	64-Core 767 48% 767 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 1,190 User benchmarks, average bench 96% Legend(17AA 229B) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3140 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.1% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 118 Parallax 132 96% 122 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 101 Splatting 90.5 85% 107 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 108%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB 9,415 User benchmarks, average bench 289% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L2QEXF7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,143 Write 1,499 Mixed 1,205 357% 1,616 MB/s	4K Read 58.8 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 72.4 252% 87.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,061 DQ Write 850 DQ Mixed 976 725% 962 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 380%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 2x16GB 438 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 24.2 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 27.4 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 73%

Battleship

CPU
Xeon E-2276MIntelBench 82%, 1,872 samples	36x

GPU
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 96%, 1,190 samples	31x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	5x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	14x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	9x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $189Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	4x

RAM
HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 438 samples	16x
HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 04CB DDR4 2666 2OZ HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 48GBHynixBench 59%, 5 samples	5x
HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2400C16 HMA82GS7CJR8N-VK 48GBHynixBench 71%, 13 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16