| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161118 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '20 at 06:12 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | URY-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.4%
Good
|
54% 85.5 Pts
|
33% 274 Pts
|
22% 353 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.1%
Above average
|
56% 78.7 fps
|
57% 70.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 68 82 96 103 78 MB/s
|
46.4%
Average
|
56% 77.8 MB/s
|
129% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.2%
Average
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
54% 74.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
| Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |