| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Latitude E6520 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0NVF5K |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180913 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '20 at 04:16 |
| Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.8%
Good
|
65% 105 Pts
|
27% 202 Pts
|
12% 201 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 0494) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
2.21%
Terrible
|
2% 2.58 fps
|
3% 3.06 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 59 24 109 44 32 MB/s
|
26.6%
Poor
|
25% 114 MB/s
|
43% 13.8 MB/s
|
20% 24 MB/s
|
|
USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
26GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
12% 13 MB/s
|
16% 1.4 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
49.8%
Average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
61% 65.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6520 Builds (Compare 1,115 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6520
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 315x |
| Core i7-2760QMIntel $130Bench 60%, 10,423 samples | 184x |
| Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples | 144x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 715x |
| NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples | 298x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 96x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $62 |