Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 96.9 2-Core 186 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 324 46% 341 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 3.53 3% 4 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-agility2 3.5 90GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 62 62 65 61 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 106 Write 93.2 Mixed 102 SusWrite 62.8 20% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 22.6 81% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 92.9 DQ Mixed 91.1 73% 104 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 4,605 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	447x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	79x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16