| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 24.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161118 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 22 '20 at 01:13 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.4%
Above average
|
51% 75.9 Pts
|
28% 224 Pts
|
17% 268 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.9%
Average
|
47% 60 fps
|
52% 64.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 98 34 82 103 MB/s
|
24.4%
Poor
|
23% 102 MB/s
|
40% 13.1 MB/s
|
11% 15.2 MB/s
|
|
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
364GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 99 100 99 MB/s
|
59%
Above average
|
68% 92.4 MB/s
|
202% 1.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.3%
Average
|
52% 18 GB/s
|
26% 9.23 GB/s
|
57% 69.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
| Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $144 |