Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 49.3 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 30.5 24% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 47.7 8-Core 52.3 7% 50 Pts	64-Core 40.6 2% 40.6 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDMCEAC120A3 120GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: LLGi SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 127 106 109 120 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 288 Write 125 Mixed 178 SusWrite 120 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 12 39% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 99.3 DQ Mixed 134 102% 140 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 5.5 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	2x

SSD
HFS128G3AMNB-2200A 128GBBench 67%, 1,805 samples	1x
HFS128G3AMNM-1010A 128GBBench 46%, 30 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16