Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 23:28
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 144
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 424
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 79.4
74% 84.3 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 76.3
73% 91 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 305 364 369 369 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 465
Write 372
Mixed 307
SusWrite 329
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 32.6
107% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 180
146% 206 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
779GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 903 1103 1144 1147 1140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,320
Write 1,120
Mixed 1,111
SusWrite 988
255% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 76.2
246% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 484
366% 491 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 212%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
266GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 376 445 457 457 457 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 460
Mixed 392
SusWrite 405
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 52.7
169% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 259
196% 262 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 20.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback