Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 22:46
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.85 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 96 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 173 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 521 47% 397 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1632 MHz, MLim: 1080 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Lighting 108 Reflection 89.8 Parallax 154 88% 117 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 117 Splatting 129 94% 112 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 275 220 201 190 167 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 462 Mixed 395 SusWrite 247 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 84.3 4K Mixed 52.8 175% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 268 194% 251 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 89GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 107 108 108 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 171 Write 153 Mixed 26 SusWrite 107 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 108%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB 5,186 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 203GB free Firmware: CC4C SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 100 102 103 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 150 Write 106 Mixed 85 SusWrite 102 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 20,216 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 21.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 15.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16