Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130417
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 21:20
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 91 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 160 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 254 31% 239 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D0) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.2% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 107 Parallax 103 91% 107 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 96.3 Splatting 82.6 82% 104 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,251 Write 4,805 Mixed 4,608 1,090% 4,888 MB/s	4K Read 360 4K Write 233 4K Mixed 195 918% 262 MB/s	DQ Read 618 DQ Write 456 DQ Mixed 459 364% 511 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100 3,663 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 32GB free Firmware: SN06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 73 73 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 67.7 Write 69 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 73 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 559GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 120 122 122 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 134 Write 111 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 120 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 1,351 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 16.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 18.6 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	184x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	158x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	133x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	22x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	21x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16