To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 21:01
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 595
55% 462 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.5% Poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 65.6
11% 31.4 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 50
Splatting 53.3
45% 55.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 122 123 128 186 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 1327
Mixed 982
SusWrite 152
220% 986 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 37.2
163% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 485
364% 488 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 139%
Great: 264%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
422GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 173 168 170 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 58.5
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 170
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
365GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 160 158 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 153
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 159
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 41.8
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback