Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 575 443 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 18 28% 34.8 Pts	4-Core 22 8-Core 22.1 3% 22 Pts	64-Core 21.5 1% 21.5 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0176) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.26% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.35 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.26% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK2565GSX 250GB 2,503 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: GJ003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 50 49 40 52 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 59 Write 51.5 SusWrite 44.5 37% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 24GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 9 12 12 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Read 32.7 Write 13.8 Mixed 9 SusWrite 10.6 19% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
575IntelBench 30%, 443 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $37

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16