Gigabyte GA-H61M-WW

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H61M-WW (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140304
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 19:33
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570S 3,597 User benchmarks, average bench 70% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570S CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 94.6 1-Core 100 2-Core 195 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 372 47% 357 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 36.1 21% 30.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 25.5 Splatting 31.3 24% 28.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 115 131 26 40 42 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.7% Below average	Read 101 Write 25 Mixed 123 SusWrite 81 18% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 26.9 92% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 61 DQ Mixed 37.4 31% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 267GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 128 130 128 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 124 Write 126 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 128 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB 29,968 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H61M-WW Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-WW

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	23x
Pentium G2030Intel $24Bench 49%, 18,277 samples	15x
Pentium G2020Intel $92Bench 49%, 15,664 samples	10x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	49x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	8x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	7x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16