Asus A78M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A78M-A  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140411
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 7.5
2-Core 40.7
27% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 57.9
8-Core 77.4
9% 67.7 Pts
64-Core 81.6
5% 81.6 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 33.2
29% 32.4 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 30.9
27% 33 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 198 227 238 238 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 246
Write 222
Mixed 218
SusWrite 222
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 11.1
33% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 105
77% 103 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
98GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 115 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 88
Write 95.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 119
58% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
25GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 70
Write 70.7
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 63.8
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-A Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-A - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $192
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback