| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Gigabyte A320M-H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190823 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 21 '20 at 15:52 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.8%
Good
|
69% 123 Pts
|
51% 381 Pts
|
24% 381 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon 550
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
16% 23.1 fps
|
21% 24.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
R5M120G8 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 415 420 418 260 59 MB/s
|
83.2%
Excellent
|
91% 404 MB/s
|
112% 44.7 MB/s
|
80% 159 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
74GB free
Firmware: 3.AAH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 70 71 69 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
48% 64.8 MB/s
|
153% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.C8FE 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
96.4%
Outstanding
|
102% 35.5 GB/s
|
79% 27.6 GB/s
|
43% 93.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,888 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 332x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 325x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 283x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 225x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 192x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 171x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $233 |