PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Intel S2600CWR (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160331 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 21 '20 at 15:45 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
|
66%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 74 73 70 139 186 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
641GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 124 124 124 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9965600-012.A02G 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples | 7x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 6x |
Xeon E5-2630 v3IntelBench 69%, 1,838 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 4x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 3x |
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples | 3x |
Raid 0 Volume 7.5TBIntelBench 126%, 21 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $428 |