Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory10.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 14:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.4% Very good
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
79% 169 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 672
70% 550 Pts
64-Core 815
55% 815 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 22
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 24.3
6% 24.7 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 34.2
6% 25.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1632 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 450.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.6% Good
Lighting 252
Reflection 263
Parallax 235
66% 250 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 244
Splatting 193
67% 204 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$169
727GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1766 1783 1275 1117 1110 1092 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,174
Write 1,840
Mixed 1,127
SusWrite 1,357
312% 1,374 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 48.8
158% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 886
682% 915 MB/s
Poor: 229%
This bench: 220%
Great: 359%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
815GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 93 91 92 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 75.9
Write 96.1
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 94.5
117% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.3
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 3,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback