PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H97M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150727 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '16 at 17:54 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
CPU Throttled | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
73%
Very good
|
||||
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
|||
40.9%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 179x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 155x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 153x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 77x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $674 |