Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 22% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 26 '16 at 17:54
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
CPU Throttled 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 45.7
26% 38.5 Pts
4-Core 87.3
8-Core 86.8
12% 87.1 Pts
64-Core 86.6
5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 110
42% 75.2 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
235GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 495
Write 398
Mixed 417
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 21.7
84% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 90.7
DQ Write 57.2
DQ Mixed 34.1
36% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 491
Write 393
Mixed 410
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 20.4
81% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 90.9
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 32.8
36% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 109%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
178GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 71.2
Write 70.7
Mixed 70.4
53% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.55
139% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 18.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $674
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback