Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-870A-USB3  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 09:19
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 93.3
49% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 78
Parallax 74.9
65% 77.6 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 76
61% 74 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 164 163 162 160 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 334
Write 242
Mixed 251
SusWrite 167
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 40.4
137% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 182
150% 212 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
23GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 45 84 28 50 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 369
Write 235
Mixed 244
SusWrite 46.8
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 42.8
144% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 42.4
DQ Write 96.9
DQ Mixed 54
46% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 85 28 50 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 197
Write 36.7
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 46.9
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
669GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 128 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 127
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 126
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 84%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
230GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 116
71% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 74%
USB DISK Pro 8GB
4GB free, PID 3e23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.1
6% 5.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-870A-USB3 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $149
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback