| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B84 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84) (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181206 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 21 '20 at 03:22 |
| Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 82% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
14% 20.8 Pts
|
6% 49.3 Pts
|
3% 41.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
14% 36.1 fps
|
47% 58.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU630 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N181017a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 28 36 2.5 4.2 4.5 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
25% 118 MB/s
|
50% 16.3 MB/s
|
45% 61.3 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
670GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 155 154 157 167 175 MB/s
|
94.4%
Outstanding
|
94% 130 MB/s
|
152% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown W641GU42J7240NB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
20.6%
Poor
|
23% 7.9 GB/s
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
14% 284 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 110 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 22x |
| Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples | 14x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 10x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $300 |